Brooke (
betweensunandmoon) wrote in
vicomte_de_chagny2018-10-24 10:44 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Gaston Leroux: the original Raoul-basher?
irukandji thinks so.
Raoul Bashing-Was Leroux the one who started it?
I'm skeptical, because I never got the impression that Leroux hated his hero. And Erik wins? Um, he dies, dearest. Did you miss that part, since it's unclear whether you've read the entire book?
Raoul Bashing-Was Leroux the one who started it?
I'm skeptical, because I never got the impression that Leroux hated his hero. And Erik wins? Um, he dies, dearest. Did you miss that part, since it's unclear whether you've read the entire book?
no subject
And if the author *tells* us that his character is brave and intelligent but fails to give any indication of this in the actual story, then that's a flaw in the writing! I don't think Raoul comes across as outstandingly brave or brainy -- he is rash and impetuous, rather, jumping to conclusions and hurling himself into trouble -- but I don't think there's any doubt as to his physical courage, or to his intelligence, on those occasions when he bothers to think. It is his social awkwardness and inexperience that cause him to flinch and suffer agonies.
But from the author's perspective, as I've said elsewhere, Raoul is not actually supposed to be the 'hero' of the story; he is simply the viewpoint character via whose confused perceptions the audience are to be led up the garden path. His 'bad attributes' -- his impetuosity and jealousy -- exist in order to keep him apart from Christine and promote the mystery. Leroux was not writing a romance where Raoul is the perfect suitor (even if the musical version doesn't really have much more of an identity than that!), he was writing a mystery in which the love interest (like Bénédict's hopeless love for another Christine in Leroux's La Poupée Sanglante) exists as a plot mechanic.
Personally, I'd assume that the author's intent was for us to identify with Raoul, favour his suit, and be frustrated at Christine's refusal to divulge the truth... but then I don't think it had occurred to him for one moment that his readers would consider Erik the romantic lead of the book. "Erik still wins" in the sense that the readers are on his side.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I see Raoul as a brave character, but thrown into a situation where he's in way over his head.
(no subject)
(no subject)